During a quarterly meeting at a major retail brand, a marketing director shared something that caught everyone off guard: “We’re measuring satisfaction, but we’re not measuring loyalty.” The team had been relying on the usual customer satisfaction surveys, Net Promoter Scores, and review monitoring tools — but none of these showed the full picture of how their customers felt during real interactions. More importantly, none of them explained why the repeat purchase rate was slowly falling.
Customer experience (CX) testing is not a vanity project. It’s the most direct way to uncover real friction points that surface between a customer’s expectation and the brand’s delivery. CX is no longer an isolated KPI owned by the customer service team; it touches marketing, product, operations, and even brand reputation. Testing and improving it isn’t a side project anymore — it’s a survival skill.
Most brands start CX measurement too late in the process. They gather feedback after an experience has already occurred — usually at the end of a purchase or a service call. By that time, the customer’s perception has been cemented. Testing needs to happen during the journey, not just afterward.
Interactive journey tracking, session recordings, and conversational analytics allow brands to see what customers are struggling with in real-time. Tools like UsabilityHub, Hotjar, and FullStory provide visibility into how a customer moves across a website or app. This is real behavior, not sanitized feedback after the fact.
An important point: scores alone don’t improve anything. If your CX testing is focused only on "how satisfied were you?" you’re missing the 'why'. Rediem’s approach to loyalty strategy highlights this often overlooked piece — real engagement metrics, like action completion and community participation, tell a far richer story than simple satisfaction ratings.
Brands often make the mistake of testing environments that are too clean. Perfect load speeds. Ideal product inventories. Predictable flows.
Real customer behavior happens under less-than-perfect conditions. Pages load slowly. Inventory fluctuates. Customer service might take longer than expected. Testing CX requires injecting real-world friction into the test environment. See what happens when a payment method fails. Watch how users react to an unexpected pop-up offer. Measure abandonment rates when checkout requires just one extra click.
Better CX testers create experience simulations that represent the unpredictability of real life. Without this, you only learn how customers behave when everything goes right — and that’s not what’s killing loyalty.
Brands obsessed with CX scores often end up drowning in reports no one reads. Activity becomes mistaken for progress.
Instead of tracking 50 different metrics, brands should hone in on a handful of performance indicators that are tied directly to behavior:
It’s better to measure fewer things with surgical precision than to track everything and change nothing.
In a project I worked on with a mid-size e-commerce brand, we restructured their customer experience testing around live scenarios:
Each test included time tracking, frustration tagging, and success ratings. We kept all flows unscripted to let users move naturally. Every time a user hit a barrier, we documented not just the barrier but the emotion behind it.
The outcome wasn’t just a list of "bugs" to fix. It became a prioritized roadmap for improving loyalty. We reduced checkout steps, reworded confusing policies, and optimized the mobile site for edge-case scenarios like low bandwidth.
By the end of the quarter, cart abandonment dropped by 17%, and customer support tickets related to refunds fell by 23%. No massive rebranding. No new loyalty gimmicks. Just sharper CX execution.
Surveys will always have a role. But customer feedback tends to be heavily filtered through memory and bias. What customers say and what they actually experience are often very different.
Behavioral CX testing brings objectivity into the equation:
When paired correctly, feedback and behavior create a 360-degree view of customer experience. If your loyalty strategy is built on point accumulation or transactional discounts alone, you’re working with an outdated playbook. Platforms like Rediem show that true loyalty stems from making the customer experience so seamless and valuable that choosing another brand feels like a downgrade.
A common trap is trying to fix too much at once. When brands get testing results, there’s often a temptation to launch a "CX improvement sprint" where dozens of changes are made simultaneously. This muddies the data.
Controlled CX improvements — where changes are isolated and measured individually — deliver far more usable insights. One of the best examples I’ve seen was a financial services firm that ran split-tests for just one improvement at a time: changing helpdesk contact placement, rewording error messages, adjusting signup flow. Each experiment had a clear success or failure marker.
When their NPS jumped 8 points over six months, they knew exactly which changes were responsible. No guessing. No false attribution.
Most CX benchmarks aim to be "good enough." Brands look at competitor scores and set their goals based on industry averages.
That’s not how loyalty leaders operate.
Amazon doesn’t want to match retail averages. Starbucks doesn’t want to match coffeehouse averages. They set expectations higher than the industry and force competitors to chase them.
Customer experience testing, when done right, isn't about catching up. It’s about creating a gap so wide between your brand and the next option that customers don’t even bother shopping around.
Real customer experience excellence isn’t won with slogans or splashy campaigns. It’s earned in the small moments: the faster refund, the smarter chatbot, the checkout flow that feels effortless. Brands willing to measure and improve those small moments — with precision, realism, and patience — will win loyalty that no discount or reward program can ever buy.