When companies talk about optimizing loyalty, they’re often stuck in a loop—refining discounts, tweaking rewards, offering bigger prizes. But community-driven loyalty programs don’t work like that. They hinge on participation, shared values, and experiences that feel personal. This makes A/B testing not only useful, but essential. You're not just testing which coupon performs better—you're testing how people want to belong to your brand.
The mechanics of community engagement are subtle. Some customers want recognition. Others want to contribute or collaborate. Knowing which lever to pull requires more than gut instinct. It demands structured experimentation that respects both the brand’s goals and the audience’s behavior.
Start with clarity: what are you actually trying to influence? Engagement doesn’t mean just logging in or completing a survey. In a community context, it might mean contributing content, voting in polls, attending virtual events, or inviting others to join. Before running any test, define which behaviors matter most.
Too often, brands test superficial changes—button colors, subject lines—without a meaningful shift in user behavior. These tests aren’t useless, but they miss the bigger picture. If your loyalty model is built on community actions, your experiments need to target deeper interactions: content preferences, challenge structures, or recognition systems.
Avoid testing high-stakes elements too early, like program tiers or reward redemptions. These can skew data and damage trust if handled clumsily. Instead, work your way up by first refining how people discover and interact with community activities.
There’s a temptation to build elaborate testing plans, but this often leads to overthinking and underdelivering. Start small. Maybe you test two types of engagement emails—one that invites customers to complete a shared action (like planting trees together) and another that emphasizes personal impact.
Let the test run long enough to gather real data. One of the biggest errors in A/B testing is acting on incomplete information. Community behavior doesn’t spike instantly. It grows through conversations, follow-ups, and small wins. You need to track beyond clicks and captures. Look for sustained participation over days or weeks.
Metrics to prioritize:
These are slower to accumulate than pure transaction data, but they’re much richer indicators of loyalty.
Not all community members respond the same way. New users might need guided tasks. Longtime advocates may crave leadership roles. A/B testing becomes more valuable when it accounts for these segments.
Say you’re testing a monthly impact challenge. One version is a solo task (e.g. reduce plastic use for a week), the other is a collaborative goal (e.g. the whole community offsets 1,000 pounds of CO2). The overall numbers matter, but the segmented results reveal more. Does the solo task attract new members? Does the collaborative one spark return visits?
Rediem, for example, allows brands to track and test actions like these across different user cohorts. It’s not just about completion—it’s about understanding what kind of impact feels meaningful to each segment.
In community-driven programs, language carries more weight than in transactional ones. People aren’t just opting into a discount—they’re signing up for something that reflects their values.
A/B test the tone of your invites. Do people respond more to casual, friendly copy or direct, purpose-driven calls to action? Is a message more effective when it celebrates past accomplishments, or when it lays out a challenge for the future?
Even subtle changes—“Help us reach our next milestone” vs. “You’ve helped us do so much—let’s go further”—can produce different patterns of engagement. The goal isn’t just to get a response. It’s to get the right response: a person choosing to act because they feel connected.
One of the hardest truths about A/B testing is this: the test you think will succeed often won’t. You’ll design a community initiative that checks every brand box—well written, great visuals, perfect alignment—and the response will be underwhelming. Meanwhile, the less polished alternative will take off.
This isn’t a failure. It’s the whole reason you test. You’re not just validating your instincts. You’re learning from your audience in real time.
That said, avoid overreacting to single data points. Look for patterns across multiple tests. If community challenges with social sharing outperform individual tasks three times in a row, that’s a strong signal. If one test result swings wildly, run it again before making a change.
Winning tests are more than just metrics—they’re models you can scale. If a particular format, challenge type, or copy tone leads to high engagement, bake it into your strategy. Build campaigns around that formula.
Losing tests deserve scrutiny. Was the idea flawed, or was it the timing? Did it confuse users or feel out of place? Sometimes, a failed experiment is just the wrong message for the moment. Archive the idea, but don’t trash it. Community preferences evolve.
Also, resist the urge to “over-optimize.” Not every part of your loyalty experience needs testing at the same time. Keep a core experience stable so that users feel confident, while iterating around the edges.
A/B testing isn’t a tactic you finish. It’s a discipline you maintain. Especially when your loyalty strategy leans into community engagement, the only way to stay relevant is to keep asking—what do people respond to, and why?
Build a rhythm where small experiments are always running. Use real engagement metrics, not vanity stats. Segment smartly. And above all, treat your program not as a funnel, but as a conversation—one where both sides get smarter over time.
If you’re working with a loyalty platform like Rediem, it helps that these kinds of tests and measurements are already integrated. You can define community actions that matter, see which ones resonate, and adjust without having to rebuild your strategy from scratch. That makes A/B testing not just easier, but more meaningful.
Testing tells you what’s working. Community loyalty tells you why people stay. Marry the two, and you’re not just improving a program—you’re building lasting engagement.
When companies talk about optimizing loyalty, they’re often stuck in a loop—refining discounts, tweaking rewards, offering bigger prizes. But community-driven loyalty programs don’t work like that. They hinge on participation, shared values, and experiences that feel personal. This makes A/B testing not only useful, but essential. You're not just testing which coupon performs better—you're testing how people want to belong to your brand.
The mechanics of community engagement are subtle. Some customers want recognition. Others want to contribute or collaborate. Knowing which lever to pull requires more than gut instinct. It demands structured experimentation that respects both the brand’s goals and the audience’s behavior.
Start with clarity: what are you actually trying to influence? Engagement doesn’t mean just logging in or completing a survey. In a community context, it might mean contributing content, voting in polls, attending virtual events, or inviting others to join. Before running any test, define which behaviors matter most.
Too often, brands test superficial changes—button colors, subject lines—without a meaningful shift in user behavior. These tests aren’t useless, but they miss the bigger picture. If your loyalty model is built on community actions, your experiments need to target deeper interactions: content preferences, challenge structures, or recognition systems.
Avoid testing high-stakes elements too early, like program tiers or reward redemptions. These can skew data and damage trust if handled clumsily. Instead, work your way up by first refining how people discover and interact with community activities.
There’s a temptation to build elaborate testing plans, but this often leads to overthinking and underdelivering. Start small. Maybe you test two types of engagement emails—one that invites customers to complete a shared action (like planting trees together) and another that emphasizes personal impact.
Let the test run long enough to gather real data. One of the biggest errors in A/B testing is acting on incomplete information. Community behavior doesn’t spike instantly. It grows through conversations, follow-ups, and small wins. You need to track beyond clicks and captures. Look for sustained participation over days or weeks.
Metrics to prioritize:
These are slower to accumulate than pure transaction data, but they’re much richer indicators of loyalty.
Not all community members respond the same way. New users might need guided tasks. Longtime advocates may crave leadership roles. A/B testing becomes more valuable when it accounts for these segments.
Say you’re testing a monthly impact challenge. One version is a solo task (e.g. reduce plastic use for a week), the other is a collaborative goal (e.g. the whole community offsets 1,000 pounds of CO2). The overall numbers matter, but the segmented results reveal more. Does the solo task attract new members? Does the collaborative one spark return visits?
Rediem, for example, allows brands to track and test actions like these across different user cohorts. It’s not just about completion—it’s about understanding what kind of impact feels meaningful to each segment.
In community-driven programs, language carries more weight than in transactional ones. People aren’t just opting into a discount—they’re signing up for something that reflects their values.
A/B test the tone of your invites. Do people respond more to casual, friendly copy or direct, purpose-driven calls to action? Is a message more effective when it celebrates past accomplishments, or when it lays out a challenge for the future?
Even subtle changes—“Help us reach our next milestone” vs. “You’ve helped us do so much—let’s go further”—can produce different patterns of engagement. The goal isn’t just to get a response. It’s to get the right response: a person choosing to act because they feel connected.
One of the hardest truths about A/B testing is this: the test you think will succeed often won’t. You’ll design a community initiative that checks every brand box—well written, great visuals, perfect alignment—and the response will be underwhelming. Meanwhile, the less polished alternative will take off.
This isn’t a failure. It’s the whole reason you test. You’re not just validating your instincts. You’re learning from your audience in real time.
That said, avoid overreacting to single data points. Look for patterns across multiple tests. If community challenges with social sharing outperform individual tasks three times in a row, that’s a strong signal. If one test result swings wildly, run it again before making a change.
Winning tests are more than just metrics—they’re models you can scale. If a particular format, challenge type, or copy tone leads to high engagement, bake it into your strategy. Build campaigns around that formula.
Losing tests deserve scrutiny. Was the idea flawed, or was it the timing? Did it confuse users or feel out of place? Sometimes, a failed experiment is just the wrong message for the moment. Archive the idea, but don’t trash it. Community preferences evolve.
Also, resist the urge to “over-optimize.” Not every part of your loyalty experience needs testing at the same time. Keep a core experience stable so that users feel confident, while iterating around the edges.
A/B testing isn’t a tactic you finish. It’s a discipline you maintain. Especially when your loyalty strategy leans into community engagement, the only way to stay relevant is to keep asking—what do people respond to, and why?
Build a rhythm where small experiments are always running. Use real engagement metrics, not vanity stats. Segment smartly. And above all, treat your program not as a funnel, but as a conversation—one where both sides get smarter over time.
If you’re working with a loyalty platform like Rediem, it helps that these kinds of tests and measurements are already integrated. You can define community actions that matter, see which ones resonate, and adjust without having to rebuild your strategy from scratch. That makes A/B testing not just easier, but more meaningful.
Testing tells you what’s working. Community loyalty tells you why people stay. Marry the two, and you’re not just improving a program—you’re building lasting engagement.
ready to make the switch? we automatically migrate your customers points from Yotpo, Smile and others so your customers don't miss a beat.
.png){kind=icon}
